Archive for November, 2009

A post by Gabriel Long

A post by Gabriel Long

At the start of the Reach Film Fellowship, there were two important aspects of my film, Brothers, I was hoping to get help with. First, I didn’t feel confident about how I would handle casting and directing young actors (my two main characters are children). I know that getting a natural performance from a child, one that doesn’t feel self-conscious, is going to be key to my film. Second, I felt that my script could be improved, but couldn’t decide what to change.

Casting and Directing Child Actors
During our re
cent advising workshop with Writer/Director Tze Chun (Children of Invention), there were some very useful takeaways related to casting and working with children.

More from his workshop will be posted on this blog soon, I think, but one piece of advice he gave was particularly useful to me. Tze said that when casting a role, it’s critical to keep in mind the specific demands of the part. A very natural young actor who doesn’t have a great deal of acting ability can work well for a role that doesn’t contain many highly emotional scenes. If the character needs to display a great deal of strong emotion, however, more acting ability is necessary even if this means sacrificing naturalness to some degree.

Directing Child Actors Workshop with Tze Chun

Directing Child Actors Workshop with Tze Chun

When I entered the casting process and had to begin making decisions, I took Tze’s advice and looked for the right balance of acting ability versus naturalness.  We auditioned 20 actors for the two open roles and had four, two actors per character, come in for callbacks.

At callbacks, I was careful to go over the most emotionally subtle parts of the script several times to see what each actor could bring to the moments. In this script there are no highly emotional scenes that call for crying, or throwing a tantrum, so I decided I could err on the side of naturalness over acting experience, while making sure that the actors were skilled enough to understated and convey the emotions of the scenes.

Also critical to me, was looking at the chemistry between each pair of actors. My two actors will be playing brothers and the story hinges on the subtle interactions that make up their relationship.

Now that my film is cast, I am looking ahead at how I will work with my actors in rehearsal and on set. In my discussions with my mentor, Laurie Collyer (Sherrybaby), Laurie has really emphasized using improvisation as a lead-in to scripted scenes in order to get a more natural performance from child actors. Tze also advised that I give my young actors a set of actions to execute whenever possible, rather than a single action, in order to keep them from over-emphasizing each one. I’ll definitely be employing these tactics.

Refining My Script
There were a lot of things I liked about my script going into this process, but in some ways I felt like I wanted to make it better. The story didn’t feel as compelling or engaging as I wanted it to. It was tight, but a bit predictable.

In terms of re-writing, however, I felt I was at a bit of a dead end. I felt that every element of my script was so connected to the whole piece that unless I overhauled it, it would be difficult to improve.

During my second meeting with Laurie, we analyzed my script in depth. Based on her advice, I did a complete re-write of the script, viewing it as an exercise rather than an attempt to come up with a different story. She thought it might free me up to continue improving on what I had.

The idea of writing an “exercise” script was very freeing and allowed me to get past my attachment to the interconnectedness of the previous draft. The resulting draft wound up involving the same location, characters, and subject matter, but was very different and significantly better. I allowed myself to completely re-imagine scenes with the knowledge that if they didn’t work I didn’t need to use them in the final version.

Rather than taking the best elements of the exercise script and melding them into the older draft, I did the reverse. I ended up taking the moments in the older draft that I thought held the essence of the story and constructed a new narrative around them. The end result was a more natural and compelling story.

RFF 2010 Fellow Gabriel Long (mentored by Laurie Collyer) has done extensive work in both narrative and documentary film. Two of his documentary projects were nationally broadcast by Current TV. Swimming New York City documents a swimming race around Governor’s Island, and The Art of Sticks offers a portrait of outdoor sculptor Patrick Doherty. He has also completed seven narrative short films, most recently Adán, which follows a schoolteacher as he travels from his home in Ecuador to New York City, trying to find a friend in the wake of a school shooting. Long recently moved to New York City where he works as an assistant director, editor, and writer. Gabriel’s RFF Film, Brothers, is about two young boys living in the shadow of a hot-tempered father. As the younger brother grapples with his sexual identity and the other becomes his unlikely protector.

A post by Courtney Hope

A post by Courtney Hope

To be perfectly honest, I’m not a big fan of nature. I grew up in Pennsylvania, in a county with the most parks per capita ratio in the country. I went to a private school with trees and lawns and a rose garden. My parents forced me to go to camp and sleep in a cabin – for which I may never forgive them. But when the time came for me to choose my own setting, I chose the bleakest landscape of all – New York City. And I’ve managed to avoid the great outdoors ever since.

So why then would I chose to set my RFF Film, Wild Birds, entirely in the woods – in the middle of November – in the hometown where all those trees once suffocated the city girl in me? I was asking myself some of these same questions as I dragged my key crew into the heart of the forest that sometimes haunts my nightmares.

My DP, Carole has the exact opposite opinion of woods than I do. She can’t get enough trees and berries and acorns – and other strange things she picks up as we walk.

“You sure that’s edible?” I ask as she sinks her teeth into something she found on the ground.

She explains that the acorns she’s chomping on can be made into flour if you can gather enough of them. I can’t help but to roll my eyes. Why would anyone ever do that?

My Production Designer Emmeline, also has an affinity for the woods. But she’s from Vermont, where that sort of attitude is mandatory. She collects leaves and twigs and seed to flatten into the notebook she’s brought with her. I really don’t fit in with these woods enthusiasts.

So here I am, wandering off trails in the woods searching for the strangest looking trees we can find. And there really are some crazy-looking spots in these woods.

“This place is like an evil Disney forest,” Carole notices.

An illustration from the Wild Birds team

An illustration from the Wild Birds team

“Yeah, I know. Woods are terrifying,” which leads us into a discussion of what kind of woods the characters try to hide in. Are they nice woods that are easy to live in, mean woods that hurt the girls, uncaring woods that watch the girls struggle without offering any guidance? We decide that the woods are like their mother (who is omnipresent, though we never meet her on screen), somewhat cruel, but unintentionally so. They’re just wild unsympathetic woods, but they wouldn’t go out of their way to harm the girls. So it’s settled, abusive-mother-woods. That’s what we’re after. This changes how we analyze each attractive patch of nature we come across.

Emmeline smashes some berries into her notebook. “Look at all these bruise colors. These are great.”

Carole points out some poison ivy. “Let’s not shoot in poison ivy. That’s the last thing we need is itchy actors.”

“Wait, this yellow leaf? Did I touch it? Did anyone notice if I touched this poison ivy?” No one’s noticed. Great. Now I’m going to have poison ivy. How did I grow up in Pennsylvania and never learn what poison ivy was. I was a girl scout… for a year…

Wild Birds location scout photo

Wild Birds location scout photo

Then we come upon my favorite place in these woods, a strange start of a building that was never finished. It’s just a corner of bricks that stick up under a tree. We decide this is our first choice for the dead bird scene. It has the right sort of half-warmth of home and half-empty and uncaring feel to it.

Then we find other strange pipes and old wells sticking out of the ground throughout the place. These woods are picture ready!

At the suggestion of a local film enthusiast, my crew and I drive to an abandoned amusement park in Easton, PA. We were told it flooded in the 90s and was never repaired. On the way there, Emmeline spots an empty birds nest near the side of the road. She demands we pull over so she can pick it up. I take this nest as a good omen.

When we arrive at the amusement park, the gates are locked. But it looks like the sort of place teenagers would have a way into, and after a quick search, we find a place where we can sneak through the fence. This place is definitely a popular trespassing zone, with trash everywhere.

We walk through this abandoned amusement park and all we can talk about is the horror film we should shoot there one day. What kind of creepy things go on here at night? I don’t want to think about it. I’m already afraid of everything.

I loudly try to focus the conversation off serial killing clowns and back on the film we’re actually shooting.

We decide that most of the amusement park is unusable because it’s too obvious – placing abused children in a dilapidated place that represents childhood would feel clichéd. But in the back of the park are a few shed-like structures that seem to be falling apart. “Does this look like it could be in the woods?”

“We could use it for the beginning,” Carole chimes in.

“Or a rain location.” I make a face. Please, don’t let it rain!

“Oh right, rain locations…”

And with that in mind, we walked quickly out of the haunted park back to the safety of our cars.

We found some great locations, took a ton of photos, and survived a few hours in the woods without anyone succumbing to poison ivy. It was a good day and a good scout, even if it did take place outside.

RFF 2010 Fellow Courtney Hope (mentored by Jeremy Kipp Walker) recently graduated from New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts with a degree in Film & Television. While a student at NYU, she wrote and directed several short films. Hope’s thesis film Sex & German Grammar, was awarded the prize for Best Cinematography at NYU’s Fusion Film Festival and screened at the Southside Film Festival and the Palm Springs Shortfest. Hope has also shown films at the London Super Short Film Festival and the Reed Media Festival, and took home a prize at the 2007 Southside Image Over Words competition. Hope recently completed her first independent short, Another First. Courtney’s RFF Film, Wild Birds, is about two young sisters who enter the woods determined to be “wild.” As the story unfolds, we begin to understand what they are running from, and see the power dynamic between them shift as the younger sister develops second thoughts about their plans.

Anthony Morrison

A post by Anthony Morrison

Three feet tall and rising; a classroom of two and three year olds is buzzing. The New York Child Resource Centers in the south Bronx and Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn offer early intervention services for children diagnosed on the autism spectrum. I visited the school once in March, then again in May, meeting with the owners and principals, couple Michelle and Dr. Fred Weinberg. Together we brainstormed potential stories for Bye, the documentary that would eventually become my entry into Cinereach’s Reach Film Fellowship. Michelle joked there were a million stories within the classroom.

In those two short months separating our visits, there was visible development and learning; kids now saying their first words, some transitioning out of special education into traditional kindergarten classrooms. In October, as I returned to the school, I struggled to choose one perspective as my focus for the film: whose angle on this story provides the best frame? There are Principals Michelle and Fred, there are the therapists who guide the students, there are the kids themselves (some of whom are recently diagnosed and are new to the classroom). How do I decide which will work best within the time constraints of a 5-10 minute piece? I know I can’t follow them all.

In my last short doc, specificity of perspective was a problem. I was lucky enough to travel to South Africa and co-direct a documentary about the role of protest music in the current struggle against HIV. We shot for forty-one days, collecting over one-hundred and fifty hours of footage. While in production, these numbers were confidence boosters. We followed fifteen different characters but only for three days each. A part of me felt that there must be something buried within that large amount of footage that would give us a compelling narrative – each of the MiniDV tapes like little bricks in a foundation. I found out in the editing room, however, that too much footage, covering too much ground, can sink a project. The overwhelming weight of hundreds of tapes made a final cut seem impossible. Our content was extensive, but didn’t go quite deep enough into any one storyline or character to build the kind of story I had hoped for.

Through the Reach Fellowship I was lucky enough to be matched with Mad Hot Ballroom Director Marilyn Agrelo (my mentor) and Yoni Brook (consulting producer of RFF and a Cinereach grantee for his films Bronx Princess and A Son’s Sacrifice). These two have helped me narrow my focus by challenging me to write a defining statement for the film; part artist statement, part hypothesis. This statement should guide my focus as I pick and pursue an angle into the world I have chosen to tell a story about. I made more visits to both centers and spent time observing therapy in action – wrestling all along to find a simple phrase or question that could guide my efforts to capture the action. My first attempts were oversimplifications: Was this a drama about the intersection of poverty and autism? Was this a political story about families fighting for educational rights for kids on the spectrum? Although valid questions, they are very broad, too much for a ten minute cut. I could already see the stacks of MiniDV tapes piling up.

Part of the Reach Fellowship includes meetings with advisors from different facets of the film business and getting their perspectives. One evening, after I had spent a day at the school, still unsure of who my main characters were, all of the fellows met with Cinematographer Michael Simmonds at the Cinereach offices. One of his main points of advice was to emphasize the importance of specificity, being economical with our choice of shots when covering a scene. He explained how simple, specific shots expressing simple ideas are the best building blocks for communicating larger, very complex ideas. (I’m butchering this, but he used the example of communicating a story about a baker’s wife cheating on her husband. To convey it, all you need is 1) shot of bed rocking 2) shot of waiting butcher 3) shot of wife, meeting husband, disheveled clothes.)

Michael Simmonds advises the RFF Fellows on Cinematography

Michael Simmonds advises the RFF Fellows on Cinematography

During our conversation with Mike, I began thinking about what types of situations would allow me to collect the simple building blocks of my story. What was the most basic and most interesting thing I could capture that would communicate a compelling, larger idea – one that reflected why I was drawn to this subject to begin with. It then struck me that the purest and most essential moments I could capture would be those of daily learning and social interaction between the kids during their first introduction to the school environment.

For the autism populations in Brooklyn and the Bronx who are so scattered and sometimes isolated by stigma or because they are undiagnosed, this classroom serves as a rare chance to interact with peers. This is one of the most essential things they gain from being at the schools, and is also a human and relatable need audiences will immediately identify with.

This guided me towards my first formal attempt at a defining statement: These kids deserve the same chance at being in a classroom as everyone else. Scenes that show that can be the building blocks of my film. The majority of my footage for the doc should come from material captured within the classroom and show how the rare, early intervention services Michelle and Fred’s unique schools provide are life changing for these students.

Now days away from starting principal photography, I feel armed with my defining statement. The process of struggling to define it is extremely helpful in establishing a structure and distinguishing the excellent scenes from the great. The statement reminds me what is at the core of this story, keeping me specific about what scenes we shoot, but at the same time open to surprises. Coming up soon, our first test shoot. My DP, Ivaylo Getov, and my sound mixer, Shawn Axman, will do a two-day trial shoot in the classroom to test our setups, then my editor Andrew Siwoff begins cutting. In our first sequence, we will document the arrival of a new student and the class’ reaction.

2010 RFF Fellow Anthony Morrison (mentored by Marilyn Agrelo) studied film at NYU. In 2006 he co-directed Body Soldiers, a documentary about the role of protest music in fighting HIV in South Africa, winner of a production grant from the Kaiser Family Foundation. Recently, he worked as a researcher for This Is Not A Robbery, by Andrea Lauren Productions, which premiered at the 2008 Tribeca Film Festival. In his RFF Film, Bye, a class of two-year-olds  faces opportunities and challenges at a school for previously undocumented autistic kids.

Courntey_Hope

Courtney Hope (RFF Fellow, 2010)

Read the article about Courtney and Wild Birds that appeared in The Morning Call of Allentown, PA  here. Please note that the article gives the wrong url for the film’s web site. The actual site is wildbirdsfilm.com.

Congratulations Courtney, the site looks fantastic!

    Events

    Archives

    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
    • 2008
    • 2007