Archive for February 2010

A still from Dena Greenbaum's RFF film "Blues"

A still from Dena Greenbaum's '09 RFF film "Blues"

RFF ‘09 alum Dena Greenbaum’s film Blues is on the U.S. festival circuit! Here are some details on the festivals where you can catch a screening:

The film will begin its tour in Los Angeles at the 15th Annual International Family Film Festival, which takes place March 10th-14th. Blues screens on March 13th at 10am.

Following this will be the Los Angeles Women’s International Film Festival taking place March 26th – April 1st where Blues will screen Monday, March 29th at 1:30.

Then it’s on to the 11th Annual Memphis International Film and Music Festival, April 22nd – 25th.

And lastly, Blues will screen at the National Film Festival for Talented Youth in Seattle, WA  which takes place between April 29th – May 2nd. Catch the Blues screening Sunday, May 2nd at 2:30 pm.

Congrats Dena!

A post by Gabriel Long
A post by Gabriel Long

Choosing a title for my Reach Film Fellowship short was a struggle.

The story follows two brothers as they navigate a newly complex relationship over the course of one afternoon, so naturally my first working title was Brothers. It worked fine and stated something simple and factual about the story, so it stuck. I had purchased a URL, set up a website, and begun initial promotion for the project – increasing my commitment to Brothers.

As I got into production and post and my film materialized, however, I realized I needed a new title. Brothers doesn’t evoke enough visually or emotionally in a potential viewer’s mind. Furthermore, anyone who searched for “Brothers the film” online would have to dig through dozens of results related to the recently released Jake Gyllenhaal/Toby McGuire movie of the same title to find anything about my project. A quick IMDb search immediately revealed that my film would be one of many, many films called Brothers.

So I set out to find a more evocative and unique title. My first strategy was just to think about it and wait for inspiration to strike. A week later I didn’t have any good ideas, so I decided to take a more structured approach. I made lists of possible titles, asked my cast and crew for ideas, and I re-read the script looking for moments or lines of dialogue that could yield a new name. This gave me many options, but nothing that really fit.

Finally, I sat down to discuss title options with Reva Goldberg and Margaret Shafer, who run the Reach Film Fellowship at Cinereach. As we debated various ideas, for the first time I was forced to articulate what I wanted from the title. It had to be unique, evocative, and it was also important to me that it reflect the essence of my film in a meaningful way. A baseball bat is an important object in the film, but The Bat was too literal and too plain. There’s an important scene that takes place in the dining room, but My Chair at the Table felt too forced. The Hideaway appealed to me as an option that eluded to both the boys’ emerging identity and to childhood games, but Reva pointed out that it has connotations that don’t fit the film, (“It makes me think of pirates,” is how she put it).

Ultimately, Reva suggested The Drawing and when she said it, I knew that was the title. A young boy’s drawing figures very significantly into my coming-of-age story. It felt simple and solid. It evoked a key scene and symbol without giving anything away, but also hinted at the process of self-creation, of growing up.

A scene from Gabriel Long's "The Drawing" (formerly "Brothers")

A scene from Gabriel Long's "The Drawing" (formerly "Brothers")

You might conclude that the lesson here is to get other people to title your film, but that’s not quite it. In order to recognize The Drawing as the right choice, I had to develop a clear idea of what I wanted it to do. Without that knowledge, I was stabbing in the dark to come up with ideas and judge suggestions from others. Only when I knew how I wanted the title to look, sound, and feel could I select it.

RFF 2010 Fellow Gabriel Long (mentored by Laurie Collyer) has done extensive work in both narrative and documentary film. Two of his documentary projects were nationally broadcast by Current TV. Swimming New York City documents a swimming race around Governor’s Island, and The Art of Sticks offers a portrait of outdoor sculptor Patrick Doherty. He has also completed seven narrative short films, most recently Adán, which follows a schoolteacher as he travels from his home in Ecuador to New York City, trying to find a friend in the wake of a school shooting. Long recently moved to New York City where he works as an assistant director, editor, and writer. Check out The Drawing blog and Facebook page to stay updated on Gabriel’s latest news.

A post by Nadia Hallgren

A post by Nadia Hallgren

One of the main things I have learned working on Love Lockdown is that you should not trust the United States Postal Service to deliver anything on time! I’ll give you the back-story: After much debate, I decided to ask London-based Editor and Director Yusuf Pirhasan (LG 15, Kate Modern) to edit my film. Yusuf and I have worked on projects together in the past, we’re good friends, and as an editor I trust him implicitly.

My only reservation on having him cut the film was that he lives in London, and I live in New York. After much debate, interviewing other editors, and asking around for advice, I felt Yusuf was still my editor of choice. Not only is he a talented editor and storyteller that has special experience with short form content, but he’s a great friend that will work tirelessly on my project, forgive me for not getting enough cutaways, (maybe not), and will understand that I have a very limited budget.

Oh yeah, back to the USPS. I cloned my hard drive and sent one to Yusuf who four weeks later had still not received it. The Post Office had no clue where it was. Realizing I already wasted a bunch of time and should have done this three weeks earlier, I bought another drive, cloned the film again and sent it via FedEx. It arrived three days later. The original hard drive surfaced six weeks after I originally sent it. It had been stuck in customs, and they made us pay 50 pounds to get it back! Back to filmmaking: I spoke to my mentor Annie Sundberg about my editing situation since she is also cutting a film with an editor that lives in another country. She gave me some great tips on how we can communicate, and exchange footage in the easiest way possible.

Technology has made it possible to do this long-distance edit in a painless way. My editor uses yousendit.com to upload new cuts of the film. They download fairly quickly, allowing for a quick turnaround to view them and get back to my editor with notes and feedback. We use Skype to videoconference and discuss scenes, and key issues of the film. So far, so good. The edit is now going as well as a documentary edit can go.

I have also learned from this experience that I would have liked to begin editing the film earlier, during principal photography, instead of waiting until after. If I had been assembling scenes as I went, it would have made it easier to figure out what pick-ups I needed and grab them as I went along, and while I was still frequently visiting my subjects. I learned this the hard way because the family I follow in the film has moved since I was last shooting with them. This makes re-shoots in their previous apartment impossible.

This round, I’ll be in London working with Yusuf in-person, which will make communication a breeze, and I’ll have no reason to get the United States Postal Service involved.

When Tuesday Means Friday and Tomorrow Means Maybe Next Week or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying (So Much) and Love Post-Production

A post by Courtney Hope

A post by Courtney Hope

I once believed – and still do to some extent – that there is nothing in this world worse than post-production.

In pre-production, there is planning, designing, discussing, arguing, revising…. Lots of tough choices must be made, but all choices that seem full of promise, since the script is still young and revisable. With nothing set in stone, the opportunities are limitless.

And while production has its downsides, there is enough adrenaline from actually shooting your film to get you through the rough patches. Sometimes those little problems even find a way of becoming part of the creative process.

But then comes post-production, like a giant splash of cold water to the face. This is reality, your reality, your film’s reality. This is what you’re stuck with for what seems like an eternity, until the deadlines come rushing at you and it feels all too short.

Am I being dramatic? Perhaps. But let me explain.

When there is a script, in that first precious stack of pages there is a story. It’s something unreal, something waiting for you to breathe life into it.

Then there are crew members – the producer, DP, production designer – who help bring the story into focus. They make it seem real. They talk about the film like it’s actually going to happen.

Then there are actors and rehearsals and long talks over tea about character development. And they make your film feel real. They show you that essence you had an inkling of when you first wrote the outline or jotted down the first scene on a napkin somewhere.

And then there’s the shoot with the crew, equipment, wardrobe, props, makeup… Watching the monitor, staring intently at the screen where your actors and crew bring the story together, the film finally looks real. You can see the pieces falling into place.

But after the shoot is wrapped, it is real. The creative “control” becomes a bit limited. Instead of creating the puzzle, you’re handed a box of puzzle pieces to assemble. But some of those puzzle pieces don’t seem to fit, and some of them seem a little out of focus, or are too rough to connect with the piece that must go next to it. There’s something wrong in so many little places that you could just scream with frustration.

And that stupid puzzle, lying in pieces on the table – or more accurately, on the computer screen in front of you, is post-production. It’s taking all the footage and sound and performances and focus marks and everything else that you did or didn’t notice on set, taking this raw and unforgiving beast and making it into something watchable.

So now, how does one deal with this nightmarish puzzle? The trick is to put the puzzle together completely and seamlessly, to make the footage into a masterful film – something your mom and dad can be proud of (even if it’s a reminder of how you didn’t go after that law degree).

Now, turning this footage into a film will require some cheating, some “tweaking,” some sacrifices and some epiphanies. The finished puzzle won’t look like the picture on the box necessarily, but with any luck, it will be even better than the original plan. You’ll have taken some pieces of something and made it whole and new. How do you cheat on a puzzle? Well, unlike the puzzle pieces that arrive in a box ready to fit together, the footage can be cut, copied, pasted, and reorganized. You can create an entirely new picture from the one that came printed on the box by changing the order of what happens in the script or by moving a line of dialogue.

Post-production is a time to re-think the story with many creative limitations, instead of endless possibilities. You’re using what tools you have, rather than starting from scratch like you did with the script, by making new creative decisions you hadn’t considered before. It’s trusting the editor to snap the pieces into place, taking whatever means he needs to make them fit in a way that captures the story and characters. It’s trusting the sound designer to build an ambience and to enhance or create those little things you might be missing from set – like that pause of silence for dramatic emphasis.

For one example, the footage we shot for my Reach Film Fellowship film, Wild Birds, had some unintentional focus issues that at first seemed hugely problematic. My editor and I were able to make some of the out-of-focus shots work nicely in unexpected ways, however. Apparently sometimes a consistent problem can become part of the film’s aesthetic, depending on how it is used. I’m also considering adding a line of ADR to help bring out some backstory that the audience at my rough cut screening said seemed to be missing.

There’s another trick: find people to watch your cuts! And don’t just ask your biggest fan. Find people who know nothing about the film so you can get a clear sense of what the audience actually gets from it. It’s important to know what doesn’t work in the earlier cuts so you can find creative ways to fix them before you fall in love with a certain shot or scene or pacing. And don’t despair! You’d be amazed by how even the smallest change can make a world of difference.

And maybe this is the real problem I have with post-production. It’s the adjustment period. It’s letting go of the film I once thought I was going to have and being open to something else, just as, if not more, wonderful than the original plan.

“To be a filmmaker, you must first be crazy,” Esther Robinson told me (and the other three 2010 Reach Film Fellows) at a workshop she led for us in October. She was providing guidance on how to have a healthy financial life, despite the unpredictability of our lives as artists, but her comment can also be applied to the filmmakers’ creative process. Filmmakers often have to act in ways that are unexpected (not only when envisioning and creating their career paths but also when working on an individual film). We step away from the “original plan” to form a new path with every endeavor. And if you’re unpredictable as an artist, then why wouldn’t your artwork be allowed a mind of its own too? Filmmaking is a growing process, a learning experience after all.

So, I take back what I said earlier about post-production. I suppose that it is almost just as magical and exciting as pre-production, in that it is a whole new opportunity to explore the wonderful world of your film. It just takes a lot of time and thought and waiting and playing with footage and looking at things, and showing people things and admitting what does and doesn’t work in a constructive way… But if you keep at it (and what option do you have at this point?), you’ll have something really amazing at the end of it – a film. And not only a film but a learning experience, more patience, and new creative tools for your next one.

While patience is not one of my strengths, it’s something I’ll have to practice. As my grandmother has told me many a time, “Good things come to those who wait.” So I’ll keep my fingers crossed and hope that she knows what she’s talking about.

Courtney Hope (mentored by Jeremy Kipp Walker) is a 2010 Reach Film Fellow. She recently graduated from New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts with a degree in Film & Television. While a student at NYU, she wrote and directed several short films. Hope’s thesis film Sex & German Grammar, which was awarded the prize for Best Cinematography at NYU’s Fusion Film Festival, also screened at the Southside Film Festival and the Palm Springs Shortfest. Hope has also shown films at the London Super Short Film Festival and the Reed Media Festival, and took home a prize at the 2007 Southside Image Over Words competition. Hope recently completed her first independent short, Another First.

A post by Gabriel Long
A post by Gabriel Long

As we enter the later stages of the Reach Film Fellowship program, I’ve been in post on my short film, Brothers, for about two months. I’ve had several people look at successive versions – including RFF mentors, advisors and Cinereach staff – and made revisions based on their input.

I had been editing the film (which I also wrote and directed) on my own and it had come a long way as I’d explored more and more options. About three weeks ago, however, I realized that I needed to partner with an editor.

I finally made the decision to work with an outside editor – not because I think I’m overly attached to specific material, but because I’m so intimately familiar with each shot and scene, and with the overall story. I’m so close to the project it’s hard for me to anticipate how an audience member watching it for the first time might perceive it and to decide what information they need to have, and when. This realization came primarily out of feedback sessions, where I began to become aware of the disconnect between what I thought certain scenes or shots conveyed and what viewers perceived.

For example, in the opening scene, Nathan, the older of the two brothers featured in my film, comes into the room and tries to get a book away from his younger brother, Joe. The film revolves around the relationship of these two boys as they come into their own under the shadow of a hot-tempered father. Joe has hidden something inside the book that may alienate his brother – his only ally in the family – and Joe needs to appear very scared of being found out in that scene in order to lay the groundwork for the remainder of the story.

A friend watched an early cut and responded to the first scene by saying, “One brother wants to get a book away from the other one and then they talk about football, so what?” To me there was a strong sense of foreboding in the scene but my friend’s reaction helped me realize that it was only because I knew what was going to happen later. I needed to do more to ensure the audience sensed what I wanted them too, without the benefit of the additional context I had.

I went back and re-edited the scene to better highlight the moments where the younger actor looked frightened, and I was also more forceful with the editing of the scene in general. At the moment when Joe hears Nathan coming into the room, for example, I cut from a medium shot of Joe to a close up of his face. With these techniques I was able to create the tense tone I wanted.

There were many similar examples where I found my knowledge of the film interfering with my ability to see it as an audience member would. While I could have continued the editing process by going through the cycle of getting feedback and re-editing as many times as needed, now that I’m working with Editor Cedar Daniels (The Third Wave), I can shortcut the cycle. In effect, he is a filmmaking-savvy audience member capable of correcting the problems I can’t see, in addition to his technical skill as an editor. Not only will editing move faster, but I’ll end up with a better, more polished film.

RFF 2010 Fellow Gabriel Long (mentored by Laurie Collyer) has done extensive work in both narrative and documentary film. Two of his documentary projects were nationally broadcast by Current TV. Swimming New York City documents a swimming race around Governor’s Island, and The Art of Sticks offers a portrait of outdoor sculptor Patrick Doherty. He has also completed seven narrative short films, most recently Adán, which follows a schoolteacher as he travels from his home in Ecuador to New York City, trying to find a friend in the wake of a school shooting. Long recently moved to New York City where he works as an assistant director, editor, and writer. Check out the Brothers blog, and stay current via Facebook and Twitter.

Info courtesy of Danielle DiGiacomo:

IFPLabButton

IFP’s Independent Filmmaker Labs is the only program in the U.S. supporting first-time feature directors with projects at the crucial rough cut stage, before they are submitted to festivals. The Labs are a free, week-long workshop in New York offering personalized feedback and advice on all aspects of the post-production process, audience building, and distribution strategies in the digital age, followed by continued support from IFP as the project premieres in the marketplace.

More than half of Lab alumni have gone on to premiere at major festivals – including Berlin, Sundance, SXSW, Toronto, and Venice, and have enjoyed theatrical releases, been broadcast nationally, or released on DVD. Among recent alums, Geralyn Pezanoski’s Mine, produced by Pezanoski and Erin Essenmacher, opens nationwide this month via Film Movement, and Zeina Durra’s 2009 Lab project, The Imperialists Are Still Alive!, produced by Vanessa Hope, premieres in the U.S. Dramatic Competition at Sundance 2010.

Lab applications are now available for both the Documentary (deadline Feb. 12) and Narrative (deadline March 26) Labs which will take place in April and June, respectively. Read more here.

Info courtesy of:
Stephanie Barnwell
Manager of Programming & Special Guests
Full Frame Documentary Film Festival

Full Frame is accepting applications for the Garrett Scott Documentary Development Grant through Friday, February 5th.

Given in memory of filmmaker Garrett Scott (Cul De Sac: A Suburban War Story, Occupation: Dreamland), the grant funds first time documentary makers for travel and accommodations at the festival, where grant recipients will be given access to films, participate in master classes and be mentored by experienced filmmakers and industry members.

For more information and complete guidelines, click here.

The Full Frame Documentary Film Festival takes place April 8-11, 2010.

A post by Courtney Hope

A post by Courtney Hope

1,000 emails, 2,000 phone calls, 3,000 and 4,000 script revisions later, I was finally shooting Wild Birds. I had made it to set the first day, for the most part unscathed. How did I get there and how did I avoid the many catastrophes I had envisioned on the way? By organizing and planning and scheduling and reviewing everything until my production team and I were sick. But I think (and keep your fingers crossed) that it paid off. Below is a list of things I was glad I’d taken care of in pre-production:



1. Receipts. Don’t keep receipts until there’s downtime on Day 1. Start that spreadsheet with the first penny spent in development or pre-production. Having the cash in order means rentals, pay checks, petty cash, etc. is ready and accounted for. The goal is to not go broke and overdraft and rack up tons of credit due to a miscalculation or lost receipt. If you’ve planned out the shoot financially from the very start and have that master plan to go back to and adjust when you receive donations or add new expenses, there’s one less thing to lose sleep over. Sometimes it helps to see where you’re spending money when you want to cut costs too. For example: If the dinner at the production meeting cost $50 more than you wanted to spend, you know to have the next meeting/rehearsal at a coffee shop or maybe your apartment to avoid that extra expense.

2. Locking things down. Make sure everyone showing up to set is on the same page. Everyone should have the locked copy of the script and know when and where call is. It seems basic, but it’s easy to lose track of crew when there are vendors to barter with, things to pick up, things to drop off, things to buy, people to talk to, email, call…. If you have a good AD, everyone will know what’s happening, when and where, which will save you about 800 calls, texts, emails, gchats… from your crew. And it will save you a few bucks too, since you won’t have to pay for a cab for the lead actress who showed up at the wrong location across town…

Courtney watches the monitor with key crew on the "Wild Birds" set

Courtney watches the monitor with crew on the "Wild Birds" set

3. Love your crew. Which brings me to the next point: respect your crew members. You hired them for a reason. Hopefully it was because you trust them to do their jobs. Let them do their thing so you can do yours. Micromanaging will only annoy them. And you don’t want to annoy them because a. they are largely responsible for helping you make your film a reality and b. you’ll probably want to work with them again, and c. you don’t have time – you’ll be too busy directing a film! And if you hire a good producer UPM and AD, there will always be someone to listen if there are problems or complaints and craft, meals and coffee (hopefully all free – see previous blog) are plentiful and show up on time, which will help keep everyone happy.

4. Safety. And speaking of headaches, try to remember to keep a First Aid kit on set and some Emergen-c… If you’ve hired a crew who knows what they’re doing (see 3) and don’t feed them things they’re deathly allergic to (see 8 below) and you rehearsed with your actors, including stunts and other dangerous blocking (6 below) and you location/tech scout to make sure you won’t blow the place up or fall victim to a natural disaster, you should be okay. But, it’s better safe than sorry, right? Someone will probably at least need a band-aid at some point.

5. Post Production Plan. Have a plan for post before the shoot. Maybe sure your DP and editor have a conversation. Same for the sound designer and sound mixer, sound mixer and editor, you and the editor, you and the sound mixer…. It takes so long just to get to the point where you’re on set and shoot that people often forget about what comes after. Don’t end up with footage you can’t sync! A ten minute dialogue will make sure production flows right into post, seamlessly.

"Beth" and "April" in character on the set of Wild Birds

Actors in character on the set of "Wild Birds"

6. Rehearsals. While production is super important, so are your actors. They are your film – or at least what relates the audience to your film. Take time to meet with them, rehearse with them, and explain the shoot to them. I was working with child actors, so it was especially important to make sure they were comfortable with each other, me, my DP and my stunt coordinator, as well as the script, before showing up to set. I lucked out here and had some really amazing actresses, so there were no issues in the talent department. But no matter how “cool” an actor says they are with “going with the flow,” it’s probably always best to make sure you’re on the same page and that you respect them and their time (just as you should your crew’s – by being organized and ready to go at call time on day 1!).

7. Paper Work. Print out your paper work before you get to location. Make lots of image release forms. Make all cast, crew, friends and family sign them! You want to put those photos everywhere to publicize your film. But you don’t want someone to sue you because you captured them mid-blink. Own everything you shoot: still or moving! You never know what you’ll end up needing and tracking people down months later is never fun for anyone. Oh, and make sure you have someone taking stills on set, other than the boom op with her iPhone… I promise you’ll want those photos. Make sure you have the proper SAG forms, insurance papers, permits… You don’t want to risk being shut down or scramble last minute for insurance papers so you can take your equipment out of the rental house. Save yourself the time, money and very large headache by having everything ready to go, and by having copies, and by maybe making sure a few people have copies.

8. And repeat. Go through everything, AGAIN. Does everyone who needs directions have them? Are those directions correct? Whose phone will be the “contact number” on set? Who’s allergic to what and who’s a vegetarian/vegan/pescetarian/freegan… Knowing all these things and having little lists or charts will help keep things running smoothly. If the talent has the wrong address or you find out that half your crew is allergic to the peanuts in the Thai lunch after it’s delivered, you’re going to have a huge headache. So plan ahead and check everything at least twice.

9. Filing Cabinet. Keep your set paperwork (including those image release forms) neat and tidy and completed in some sort of file or drawer where you won’t forget it. Same goes for those receipts listed in 1. For receipts, it’s easiest to tape them to paper (maybe organize them by department) and make photo copies to put in a binder or file so you can more easily find the exact one you need later. Still keep the originals in an envelope though, in case you need to make returns or use a warranty on something you purchased. Don’t forget to print copies of checks cashed and deposits too. And make sure you highlight or mark-up or write somewhere which receipts are paid or owed and to whom. Keeping that updated and accurate will help ensure you pay people on time (see 3) and will help with that spreadsheet you made (see 1). Hopefully you’ll have only spent petty cash on set, so you shouldn’t owe too many people money – other than yourself of course…

10. Expect Anything. These steps all sound like the ranting of someone with severe OCD (and maybe that’s all they really are) but there will always be a problem with every shoot, no matter what. That’s a guarantee. If you have everything you can control organized and in order, you’ll be able to deal with the snafus you do run into without disrupting the production too much. Don’t risk worrying about the little things when there could be big things you’ll need to focus on – like performance and sound and camera and the guy riding a snowmobile through your shot and………….

Courtney directs an actor on the "Wild Birds" set as stunt coordinator stands by

Courtney directs an actor on the "Wild Birds" set as stunt coordinator stands by

I tried to follow my own advice as best I could and I believe it paid off (fingers crossed). The shoot went smoothly, with very few bumps along the way. Because I forced my production team into ultra-organizational mode before the shoot, I was able to focus on directing and let my awesome producer, UPM and AD handle the little problems we encountered (without me even knowing about them until we wrapped!). We also lucked out on the weather! But that I couldn’t really control (though I did have some rain locations, just in case…)

More about physical production once I’ve seen the footage with my editor… In the meantime, visit the Wild Birds web site  to read more about the production. More stills from set coming soon (and all with image release forms!)…

RFF 2010 Fellow Courtney Hope (mentored by Jeremy Kipp Walker) recently graduated from New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts with a degree in Film & Television. While a student at NYU, she wrote and directed several short films. Hope’s thesis film Sex & German Grammar, which was awarded the prize for Best Cinematography at NYU’s Fusion Film Festival, also screened at the Southside Film Festival and the Palm Springs Shortfest. Hope has also shown films at the London Super Short Film Festival and the Reed Media Festival, and took home a prize at the 2007 Southside Image Over Words competition. Hope recently completed her first independent short, Another First.

Cinereach has been notified that Reach Fellowship 2009 alumnus Dena Greenbaum received the Morris Fierberg Student Film Award for her RFF short film Blues, the story of two boys, one African American and one Jewish, growing up in Crown Heights and bonding over their love of music. Congratulations Dena! We look forward to your next project.

Learn more about the award, which comes with a $1,000 grant, here.

Dena Greenbaum at Cinereach HQ by Andrea Fischman (www.andreafischmanphotography.com)

Dena Greenbaum in October '08 (photo by Andrea Fischman)