Archive for November 2010

Keeping an Underpaid Crew Happy

A post by Nick Paley

A post by Nick Paley

When you’re the director of a low budget film you wear a lot of hats and test many skills that are far removed from the actual craft of filmmaking. People management is maybe the most important of these skills and definitely the most difficult. While I’m reluctant to take any position of authority on the topic, as I’ve made a good number of HR mistakes on my previous films, I’m hoping that articulating some of the below will help me (and perhaps you) remember best practices for dealing effectively with the people who are actually making our movies.

So what makes a good crew member? The simplest answer is people who care. These are the kind of people who call you at 3am because they thought of something overlooked at the production meeting, the kind of people who check that the doorway dolly you’re renting won’t start squeaking after one use, the kind of people who volunteer to help in capacities outside their official job description.

It’s safe to say that 99% of young people working in film have an interest in doing their jobs well and are working in film because they enjoy it. These are the qualities of a great crew member. This means that when you encounter, say, a sound guy with a nasty attitude or a crafty PA sleeping on the job, it may be useful to look again at how you are interacting with crew members during prep and on set.

No matter how many things you’re juggling, the names on your crew sheet remain human beings that require attention and courtesy. Take Jim the Gaffer. Jim’s probably as busy as you are and although he’s agreed to work on your set (probably for less than he’s worth), it’s not occupying his every thought. Not even close. This means whatever momentary encounters (emails, phone calls) he has with you, or your producer, must be pleasant, helpful and efficient – even more so than he might be accustomed to. This starts in prep, when he gets the map to your location’s fuse box a day before he asks for it or when he’s emailed the catering menu plan before he has the chance to ask if there will be be vegetarian options. On a low budget production you will have so little control over so many elements, it’s important to show your crew you’re doing all you can to make their lives easier with the things you can control. This makes them feel appreciated despite low pay, and sets a standard for thoroughness that they’ll want to meet when they get to set. It means that when Jim turns on his hero key light (rented from the cheapest house in town) and the bulb is burnt out, he’ll consider it an unfortunate fluke as opposed to a piece of supporting evidence in the case for why your shoot is going to ruin his weekend.

Beyond the obvious reason to treat people well before and during production–because it’s a good thing to do–it’s also good for your footage. If you’ve ever crewed on a poorly run film production, you know how quickly work ethic can fall apart. Whatever task you’ve been assigned immediately takes a back seat to your sleep-deprived, malnourished brain’s efforts to recall the original reason you agreed to work on the shoot. The minute your crew starts thinking like this on set, the quality of your footage is going to decline. Booms will fall into shots, focus will go soft, late-arriving props will force you to combine shots.

On my latest short film (we wrapped production this past weekend) I faced some challenges in keeping my crew content. Our shoot was three days in upstate New York. For the meager rates we offered, that’s pushing it for an NYC-based crew. We made it up to them by paying close attention to their needs and allowing for small amenities that upped the quality of their experience without killing our budget. When they got  to set, they saw that an unusual amount of care was put into our crafty and catering. They weren’t staying in a hotel,  but they were handed a bathroom kit replete with miniature toiletries, a set of sheets, towel and pillow.  These measures required a little extra spending, but you can’t put a price tag on what it means to your production to have a well-rested AC, a well-fed PA and a nicely-groomed gaffer.

Nick Paley studied film at NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts. His thesis short, Picture Day, produced with the support of the Warner Bros. Film Fund Award, was a national finalist for the 2008 Student Academy Awards and has played at festivals across the country. Nick has continued making shorts since graduation along with web content for FremantleMedia, CBS Interactive and the Upright Citizens Brigade theater. He hails from Vermont. Nick’s Reach Film Fellowship mentor, Jay Van Hoy, established the production company Parts and Labor with Lars Knudsen. This year, they premiered Aaron Katz’s Cold Weather at South by Southwest and Cam Archer’s Shit Year (starring Ellen Barkin) in the Director’s Fortnight at Cannes.

Learning to Shut Up:  A verbose director prepares to work with child actors

A post by Kaz Phillips Safer

A post by Kaz Phillips Safer

So, I would say that my biggest flaw as a director, the thing that I’m constantly working on, is that I tend to over-explain things to actors.  I’m a pretty cerebral, nay, nerdy person.  And I love ideas and I love words, and these things all come in super handy when I’m writing a script, especially since I tend to traffic in concepts and source material that are fairly esoteric and intellectual.  So being able to pull something out of the abstract and put it in literary form is a useful tool.  But when I get on set, I am always tempted to present the motivation or context of a scene to my actor in the form of a sort of diatribe.  A long-winded, highly convoluted thesis as to why they’re going to have this reaction and not that reaction to whatever’s going on. Not good.  I know this. I know I need to work on it.

A great piece of advice I once got from a very wise woman was, if you have fifteen notes, give two and the other thirteen will fall into place.  Her point being, drowning someone in “fixes” is not going to transform their performance into the nuanced, subtle, compelling nexus you were dreaming of, but just make them over think it, try to do too much, second guess what were probably good instincts in the first place, and feel overwhelmed and tighten up.  I completely get this intellectually, but have always found it hard to put into practice.

So, I have to think there was something fighting it out in my subconscious when I wrote a script in which one of the two main characters is a six-year-old girl. Didn’t occur to me until after I’d found out that I got the Reach Film Fellowship and started really gunning into the pre-production process that not only did I have no experience working with kids, but that I’d better get over my over-talky syndrome FAST because there is no better way to get a kid to clam up than to yammer at them about stuff they don’t understand. I mean, this has a negative effect on grown up actors who are used to dealing with crazy neurotic directors!

So suddenly I find myself in this self-imposed learn-to-shut-up boot camp.  How to proceed?

Going into this project, I knew what I was looking for in my young female lead. There is very little dialogue in my film (aside from a few brief lines at the very end). There is also some choreography, when my characters break into a simple, synchronized dance. So I wanted the girl I cast to be able to “play” and be un-self-conscious in front of the camera.  I didn’t want a peachy keen toothpaste commercial kid, but she did need to be kind of magnetic, not cute, but like you couldn’t take your eyes off her. I need the audience to fall in love with her and be rooting for her. And honestly, I wasn’t sure exactly what that meant, in terms of what I was looking for in an audition, I just kind of knew I’d know it when I saw it.

The audition process was going to be critical, but how to draw out these girls’ potential without suffocating their every impulse with over-explaining?  I decided to take some cues from a source that was more dance-based than dialogue-based.  It made sense for what I needed to see, and was also going to be a good exercise in keeping my direction lean and simple.

I’m the resident video designer for an experimental dance theater company.  I create and implement the multi-media elements of their performances—projections, live feed video, etc. In the process of working with them I have observed a thing or two about non-conventional forms of directing, and getting performances out of people. The artistic director of the company has a pretty remarkable ability, which I admire on a daily basis, to keep his direction founded in lean, task-based, uncomplicated instructions.  No lengthy contemplations on motive or emotional landscape (*sigh*) just clean, simple, cut to the bone type stuff.  Rather than getting bogged down in motivations or more method acting type approaches, he physicalizes everything and the performances are simpler, the performers can get there via more direct routes rather than having to think their way to a pre-determined emotional conclusion. Love it.  Working on it.

I realized, my audition needed to be very task based. So in addition to the more traditional “read these sides with the friend I have wrangled into donating their time for three hours” audition element, we also did a more unconventional exercise.  Basically, I asked the girls to come in to the audition prepared to tell me a story—could be true or made up, happy or sad, etc.  I would have them tell me the story.  Then, I would have them tell it to me again, but this time I gave them a bag full of toys and asked them to act out the stories using the toys, like puppets.

This was a very interesting and fun exercise.  There’s something quite delightful about presenting six year olds with a bag of toys and telling them to dig in. Their little faces kind of light up.  And for the most part, it worked.  Girls that had been a bit nervous or rigid when they walked in suddenly opened up like little flowers, doing voices, asking if they can use the toy bag as a character too, etc. Other girls had more difficulty with it.

It was the girls who “didn’t get it” that posed the biggest challenge for me, because suddenly I found myself in the position of having to “explain.”  I had boiled it down to what I thought was a pretty simple, basic explanation but when they’re still staring at you blankly, you have to improvise and that’s where I started getting nervous, because, sure, this was just the audition.  And if some little miss is having such a hard time understanding that I just want her to play, she’s probably not right for the role anyway.  But what about on set?  Losing light?  Flirting with over time?  What about when this little face is looking up at me not understanding why I need another take of her running to the bench and I’m struggling with the words rattling in my own head saying, she’s sort of in love with him, but in this platonic way, and even though she wants the whole cookie for herself, she sees that he’s hungry and wants to share it with him, but… have you read any Cormac McCarthy? Disaster.  Panic.  How am I going to get the finely shaded and layered performance if my actor if I can’t explain what I want from them???

And that’s when I remembered a great story, maybe apocryphal, though I like to think not, about the making of Casablanca.  And there’s some shot where Bogart’s standing at the window, and like, the Nazis have arrived, and he turns, brow furrowed and surveys the dark city and it just encapsulates the tone and tension and tragedy of the entire film.  And apparently someone asked Michael Curtiz later what he had said to Bogart to prepare him for this moment, to capture so perfectly that moment in time, what motivation or explanation he had given that resulted in such a charged, poignant performance.  And Curtiz apparently said, “I told him to stand there, count to ten, then turn his head to the left.”

The girl I ended up casting, Arden Truax, is a non-actor, though her mom is an acting teacher who works with my husband.  She’s this amazing elfin creature who went about her audition and callback very seriously.  At first I wasn’t sure, because I wanted the Penny character to transmit a sense of joy.  But then I realized it was just like the Casablanca situation.  It’s not her job to make the joy, it’s her job to walk to the bench, sit down, take the cookie out of her bag and hand it to the guy.  I just have to construct the world around her so that the end result is incandescent.  All she needs to give me is a big eyed freckle nosed canvas to paint on.  And that, I can do without saying a word.

Kaz Phillips Safer is a 2011 Reach Film Fellow. HIn her film RFF supported film,  Jolly Friends Forever More, the boundary between imagination and hallucination are tested when a homeless man is befriended by a mysterious little girl that seems able to appear and disappear at will. Kaz’s previous film Megafauna was directed and developed at AFI’s Directing Workshop for Women. It won AFI’s 2010 Jean Picker Firstenberg Award for Excellence and is distributed by IndiePix. Kaz’s RFF mentor, Karin Chien, has produced seven feature-length films, including The Exploding Girl (2009), The Motel (2005) and Robot Stories (2002), which have won over 75 festival awards, premiered at Sundance and Berlin, and have been distributed internationally.

The recent class of Reach Film Fellows is barely out of the gate and already some very exciting things have transpired.

Anthony Morrison's Bye

Anthony Morrison's Bye

Anthony Morrison’s documentary short, Bye, aired in July on PBS’ P.O.V. series and can now be viewed here in full. Gabriel Long’s The Drawing made its NYC premiere as part of a  Newfest shorts program, and all four 2010 fellows will have more updates for us soon as we prepare to usher in the next crew of four (recipients will be announced in early fall 2010).

Brendon McQueen's Skip Rocks

Brendon McQueen's Skip Rocks

Looking back at the 2009 Fellows, Brendon McQueen’s Skip Rocks premiered at the Sun Valley Spiritual Film Festival and was touted by New York Magazine; “There have been many films made about Alzheimer’s…but few of them address it with the sensitivity, and (yes) humor of Brendon McQueen’s beautifully shot and touching short film…” He’s currently developing a feature film project through his production company, Prydehouse. Dena Greenbaum’s Blues has been a selection of the 15th Annual International Family Film Festival in Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Women’s International Film Festival, the Memphis International Film and Music Festival, and the National Film Festival for Talented Youth in Seattle, and won the Morris Fierberg Student Film Award (plus a $1,000 grant from the Rehoboth Beach Film Society).

Annie Waldman's So the Wind Won't Blow it All Away

Annie Waldman's So the Wind Won't Blow it All Away

Nicholas Bruckman’s (RFF ‘08) The Grey Movie screened as a work-in-progress at Rooftop Films. Following that his debut feature documentary, La Americana, won seven awards at over 30 film festivals, and was broadcast in the US, Europe and Asia. He is currently working on the La Americana audience engagement campaign and developing new documentary projects. Annie Waldman’s (RFF ‘08) So the Wind Won’t Blow It All Away screened at Sundance 2009 and the San Francisco Documentary, St. Louis International, San Diego Woman’s, and CMJ film festivals. The film was broadcast nationally on PBS’s P.O.V. documentary series. She is currently in production on her first documentary feature, Phantom Cowboys, for which she received a grant from Cinereach. Suel Kim’s (RFF ‘08) Snap-Shot screened at the Global Peace, Non-Violence International and the San Diego Asian film festivals and as part of last year’s Emerging Filmmakers series in Rochester, NY.

Independent writer/director Tze Chun gave an advising session for the Reach Film Fellows during the 2010 Reach Film Fellowship at Cinereach. Tze shared some advice based on his experience making a short film, Window Breaker, and a feature, Children of Invention, in which children are the main characters.

This video (shot by Miranda Rhyne and edited by Stephan Greil; additional editing by Nicole Woo) is the second of three with Tze, and includes advice about directing child actors on set.

Key Points from “Working with Child Actors on Set”

When working with child actors, it’s important that they trust you and feel encouraged when they do something right. At the same time, you and your crew must maintain a professional relationship to them, rather than going overboard with affection or being overly indulgent.

Keeping the relationship within these boundaries creates an environment where your child actors can feel comfortable speaking up when they aren’t happy about something, but will do so in a professional manner.

If a kid freezes up on set, there is usually a direct cause that you can attribute the behavior to, and there is often a simple solution. Giving them a choice between two options can help if they are tired or cranky, for example, offering the option of working for another hour and being done for the day, or taking a short break before continuing for a longer period of time.

Kids might assume they’ve done something wrong when the director calls cut, or calls for another take. It is important to take a moment to explain to them the reason you are cutting (microphone noise, blocking, lighting, whatever it might be).

Just like with adult actors, child actors can have trouble delivering lines when they don’t have enough context for them. It can be helpful to ask the children questions about what is happening in the scene so you can deepen their interpretation of the actions and emotions.

Dialogue written by adults can seem unnatural when coming out of a child actor’s mouth. Tze suggests including the child in the process of making subtle changes to the lines so that they are more natural.

Being open to surprises or additional layers a kids might bring to a moment can be beneficial and create a more natural experience. It also lets child actors feel like they are an integral part of the process.

Be sure that kids are comfortable enough with the story that they understand the “big picture” of the film and can deliver their lines accordingly.

When directing child actors, don’t put too much emphasis on one action. They may become overly anxious about it, or focus too much, and create an unnatural performance. Instead, give them a sequence of a few different actions so the important ones don’t get unnatural emphasis.

Always have a backup plan for how to cover an important scene or action when shooting with kids. If something is not working after multiple takes, instead of continuing to repeat it, try another tactic.

Watch more videos from inside RFF:

A Conversation with Tze Chun Part I: Casting Child Actors
A Conversation with Mike Simmonds: Working with a DP

During Cinereach’s 2010 Reach Film Fellowship, Director of Photography Mike Simmonds led an advising session.

In this video (shot by Miranda Rhyne and edited by Stephan Greil) Mike shares his perspective on the director/DP relationship, drawing from his experience working with directors like Ramin Bahrani, Ira Sachs and Robert Siegel. See below for some key points from the video, and come back soon for more videos from inside the Reach Film Fellowship. You can watch a previous video, featuring Writer/Director Tze Chun here.

Key Points from “Working with a DP”

When selecting a Director of Photography to work with, Mike advises meeting with candidates first in a casual setting, not necessarily discussing film or the project at-hand right away. Look for compatibility, mutual respect and the potential for a true collaboration first.

Speak to other directors a DP has worked with to find out what their working relationship was like, or learn of any red flags.

While working with a DP on set, the DP and director should welcome each other’s suggestions and constructive criticisms, maintaining a calm and respectful tone. Both should feel comfortable weighing in on blocking, lighting setup, etc. without being overly rigid about each other’s roles.

The DP must be able to efficiently cover a scene or action in a manner that will make sense in the edit, within the time available. The DP and AD set the pace of the day, and speak up when the production is in danger of not making its day.

Before heading into a production, Mike suggests knowing how you would shoot each of your scenes in one shot, even if you don’t end up doing so, to force yourself to decide who is most important in that scene.

Mike advises that creating storyboards works best when preparing to shoot on a set or a constructed location. When your locations are real places, he suggests shooting stills or video (while also scouting the locations at the time of day you’ll be there during production) in order to map out your shots and understand lighting needs.

Shooting your film in a simplistic style, with as small and efficient a crew as possible, is the best way to learn from the process. It also allows you to focus on telling your story clearly and effectively.

When you’re not in production, Mike recommends watching as many films as possible, developing an inventory of images in your head. These images train your eyes and can can be used as frames of reference when you are shooting your own films.

More videos from inside RFF:

A Conversation with Tze Chun Part I: Casting Child Actors
A Conversation with Tze Chun Part II: Working with Child Actors on Set

RFF_300x250_dark

The deadline for the 2011 Reach Film Fellowship (RFF) is quickly approaching! All applications must be submitted via our online form by midnight (EST) July 12th. Any sample materials or references/recommendations you plan on mailing to the Cinereach offices must be postmarked by July 12th.

Please visit the how to apply page to get started. For tips on applying from last year’s Fellows, please click here. And for an inside look at the RFF program, check out our behind-the-scenes video from RFF 2010. We’ve also recently posted a video containing excerpts from an RFF advising workshop with Writer/Director Tze Chun about casting child actors.

If you have any questions regarding eligibility or anything related to the application process, feel free to email us at info@thereachfilmfellowship.com.

Independent writer/director Tze Chun gave an advising session for the Reach Film Fellows during the 2010 Reach Film Fellowship at Cinereach. As the fellows prepared to go into production on their short films, Tze shared some advice based on his experience making a short film, Window Breaker, and a feature, Children of Invention, in which children were the main characters.

This video (shot by Miranda Rhyne and edited by Stephan Greil, additional editing by Nicole Woo) includes some excerpts of the session during which Tze touched on the casting process.

Below we’ve also listed some key points from the video.

Key Points from “Casting Child Actors”

For a film that is highly improvisational and naturalistic, and in which a large emotional range is not required, prioritize looking for children who are outspoken and natural in front of the camera. Try asking children to play games with each other or adult actors during auditions, rather than reading from a script.

For a more tightly scripted film, and/or one that calls for a large emotional range, actors who are old enough to read from the script should do so. Look for actors who are comfortable in front of the camera and can also emote and understand the character, rather than just being good at naturalistic reactions to real situations.

Actors should audition with the most emotional scenes, to make sure the right notes can be hit. One of the largest challenges of working with children is helping them portray dramatic emotions like crying or a tantrum believably.

Make sure actors who will appear on screen together can give performances that match in style and tone, and can be cut together, so they seem to inhabit the same world. Actors should be similarly naturalistic or ‘big’ depending on the director’s needs.

In addition to auditioning acting ability, you are also looking for a child’s stamina and concentration. If they get frustrated quickly, or can’t put up with having to repeat something multiple times, they aren’t cut out for your set.

When you’re casting a kid, you’re also casting the parents. Look for parents who are going to be understanding about the process, willing to commit all the time and energy that is required, and who are on board with the project in general.

It is also advisable to be very clear and direct with parents regarding expectations and what will happen, otherwise you may lose their cooperation.

Watch more videos from inside RFF:

A Conversation with Tze Chun Part II: Working with Child Actors on Set
A Conversation with Mike Simmonds: Working with a DP

IFP is currently accepting submissions for the Spotlight on Documentaries area of its project forum at the upcoming Independent Film Week. The deadline to apply is Friday, May 21.

Spotlight on Documentaries participants will take part in one-on-one meetings with financiers, 25-minute micro-cinema pitch screenings,  and be included in an Industry Video Library, roundtable discussions with festival programmers, and private events with buyers and programmers.

Spotlight on Documentaries is for U.S. filmmakers only (U.S.-born or living and able to work in the U.S.). Submissions should be feature length projects (50 minutes or longer) in production or post-production. They cannot be completed works, and work-in-progress material must be submitted.

Submit an online application here and mail in two DVD copies of your sample work to be considered.

Cinereach Intern Laura Elliott Interviewed the 2010 Reach Film Fellows. She summarizes their responses below.

RFF_300x250_dark

Cinereach is now accepting applications for the 2011 Reach Film Fellowship. Leading up to the July 12, 2010 deadline, I thought it would be useful for current applicants and prospective fellows to hear about what to expect from the outgoing fellows, while the experience is fresh in their minds.

I interviewed the 2010 fellows via email and am sharing some of their responses here with those who might follow in their footsteps. Please don’t forget to also thoroughly read the RFF how to apply, program guidelines and FAQ sections of the Cinereach web site for all the official details.

The e-interviewees are: Nadia Hallgren (nonfiction, Love Lockdown), Courtney Hope (fiction, Wild Birds), Gabriel Long (fiction, The Drawing), and Anthony Morrison (nonfiction, Bye).

The 2010 Reach Film Fellows

The 2010 Reach Film Fellows

Question 1: What stage was your project at when you applied for RFF and what was your approach to filling out the application?

For any habitual procrastinators out there, here’s a glimmer of hope: Courtney and Nadia both found out about RFF just two days before the deadline and were able to submit successful applications! On the other hand, if you’re reading this before July 10th please don’t wait. All of the 2010 fellows had put plenty of thought into their films before applying – even those who didn’t know they would be candidates.

Nadia knew she wanted to make a film inspired by the late-night-radio show “Lockdown Love.” The show featured shout-outs from women callers giving emotional messages to their incarcerated husbands and boyfriends and Nadia wanted to find some of the women and tell their stories. The show’s DJ Cherry Martinez would be the key window into the film, but Nadia had not asked her to participate yet. Before applying, Nadia says, “I quickly contacted Cherry Martinez  and asked her if she would be interested. She got back to me right away. I then worked on the application for two days with my producer, Jamie-James Medina.”

Anthony writes “this was my second year applying for the Reach Fellowship. The first year I applied, I submitted a documentary that was a work in progress. It did not really fit the criteria and was not accepted (Surprise! Read the program guidelines!).” The second time around, Anthony applied with a film that was in early pre-production, the ideal stage for RFF candidates. He had located two potential documentary subjects, administrators of a school in the Bronx that serves young children diagnosed with autism, but had yet to figure out which children would be featured.

Courtney writes “I had a draft of the script for Wild Birds, had planned a fundraising party for later that summer, and had attached key [crew], but wasn’t really sure how I would actually fund the film. Learning about the Cinereach Fellowship, even so close to the deadline, was sort of a miracle. My producer and I stayed up until four am to complete the application, mailing it in just in time. Fortunately, most of the questions were topics I had already discussed with my producer and/or DP, or condensed versions of what I had written for the film’s prospectus. But it was still a crazy two days!”

Gabriel wrote his script for The Drawing (which was titled “Brothers” at the time) during his senior year of college at Cornell. Most of the time he spent on the RFF application was applied toward re-writes and crafting answers that focused on the Cinereach misson. “The information session that was held [at DCTV] a few weeks before the deadline helped me figure out how I should approach the application, said Gabriel. “My main takeaway from the event was the phrase ‘vital stories artfully told,’ which was how the Cinereach staff described the projects they were looking for. I made sure that my script was telling a story from a unique perspective, and was thus vital (I hoped), and I also made sure to articulate why I wanted to tell the story, hoping that this would indicate my ability to tell it artfully.” Gabe also asked a friend to draw some storyboards and concept art to help make his application visual. DCTV will host an RFF info session again this year on June 14th.

Each successful RFF application demonstrated that the filmmaker had a compelling and artful film to make, and was able, and determined, to complete it.

Question 2: When you were invited to interview, as a finalist, how did you prepare and what did you try to emphasize?

“I figured that since I’d made it to the interview stage, the staff thought the subject of my story fit with Cinereach’s socially conscious mission,” Gabriel recalls. “That meant I needed to [concentrate on] selling the staff on my storytelling ability” during the interview.

Anthony shares that he “prepared by going over my original application and by revisiting a classroom at the school where my film would be shot to be around the kids. This visit was crucial because in the interview itself I could focus on [conveying] what I was drawn to about my subject: the infectious energy of the students and the classroom.” He adds that he also tried to think of Cinereach staff he met not as interrogators, but as potential collaborators and “I was open about my questions/uncertainties for the project. It’s alright not to have all the answers.”

Nadia tried to be as relaxed as possible for her interview and, not knowing what to expect, was pleased to find that the Cinereach staff made her feel comfortable. “I tried to emphasize that although I didn’t have conventional film school training, I had a good amount of hands-on experience that would help me in the making of my film.”

Courtney was a little less thrilled with how her interview went (though Cinereach staff felt she did just fine – and may be critiquing herself too harshly). “I’m pretty sure my interview was not so good…but I wore a dress!” Courtney recalls. “I remember that. And I remember hoping Reva [the fellowships manager] would let my terrible interview slide because we both have our noses pierced.” (Reva assures me that was not the reason Courtney was selected). But, Courtney continues, “I would say interviewees should have someone practice-interview them based on what they wrote for their application, or practice telling yourself in the mirror why you want to make your film and why you care about the underlying issues it addresses.” She goes on “sometimes it’s much harder to express how you feel about your project aloud, or remember where those ideas came from after spending so much time translating them into words on a page.”

Question 3: How did your past experiences prepare you for what was required of you during the Reach Film Fellowship?

Each of the 2010 fellows had prior hands-on experience directing short films, as well as having gained experience working on other directors’ sets. At the same time, each was very eager and open for more experience writing/directing/producing with professional guidance.

Although Courtney had made other short films as a student at New York University, and seen them screen at festivals, she still felt like her knowledge of filmmaking was somewhat theoretical. “Having experience putting a shoot together helps to avoid problems you’ve encountered before. I definitely learned a whole lot from the Fellowship, though. I think I knew theoretically how to do so many things but the Fellowship helped me put those concepts into action. That was true for everything from script rewrites to audience building.”

Also a graduate of NYU with student films under his belt (fiction and nonfiction), Anthony applied after having gone through “an extended period of working as a production assistant on T.V. shows.” Doing that, Anthony found that it was very difficult to gain up-close exposure to professional filmmakers working in the industry. He began to “crave collaboration” over what he calls “the walkie-talkie cog life of a part-time PA.” Cinereach treats the fellows as peers, he says. “I was blown away by the access we’re given to working filmmakers – advisors who donate their time and come in to meet with us.”

Nadia didn’t have an academic film background, but had more hands-on industry experience than most of the other fellows because she had worked her way up from a Production Assistant to Camera Assistant to her current role as a Director of Photography for some of the most prominent documentary filmmakers working today. This experience gave her the confidence and skill to not just direct, but also shoot her own film, and capture it in a manner that was aesthetically and technically on par with the well-crafted feature docs she DPs.

Gabriel began RFF after having gained most of his experience from his senior thesis film, a 25-minute film he made in New York, using a professional crew. The crew of this production was much larger than his crew for his RFF film, The Drawing, and there were many more locations. “Making my thesis film gave me a good sense of what crew and equipment I needed and what I could do without,” he says. Gabriel also made a conscious effort to treat the workshops and meetings during RFF like he would have treated college seminars. “In order to get the most out of them, I tried to always come prepared—whether that meant taking notes and having questions ready or simply having my ideas organized in my head.”

Question 4: What were your major takeaways from the fellowship?

For Nadia, the biggest takeaway from the process was the experience of finishing a film in a very condensed period of time (fellowship films must be completed between September and April in order to screen at RFF’s culminating screening event, Reach Out). It was a big challenge but also left her with a great sense of accomplishment. “There was no time to procrastinate. Just do. Deadlines are very important to get me motivated.”

Courtney recalls “having a group of people from different professional backgrounds [DPs, producers, editors, composers, other writer/directors] help me through the project was incredibly useful. I think in film school, this connection isn’t really made. If you write a script for a screenwriting class, it’s rare to then analyze the [same] script for scheduling and budgetary purposes.”

Anthony adds that this opportunity was a chance to “surround yourself with people who are more talented than you. My crew [for this project was very skilled] and they made this project their own. In many ways I felt my role of a director was to get out of the way and let my crew do their work.”

For Gabriel, the Reach Film Fellowship experience reaffirmed that there is no substitute for experience. “Our mentors and advisors were able to help me along and point me in the right direction only because they’ve built up lots of their own experience making films.”

Question 5: What are you doing now? And where do you go from here?

We’re excited to report that Anthony’s film, Bye, has been licensed for broadcast (more details on that as we have them). He adds “right now, I’m working on distributing Bye and applying to film festivals. The fellowship has also exposed me to resources for documentary filmmakers, workshops and labs and I’m hoping to participate in some [of those] in the future. More than anything, I want to continue working in documentaries, as a PA, driver, anything. Wait, PA’s on documentaries don’t need walkies, right?

Courtney is writing a feature version of her RFF film, Wild Birds, and applying for grants to develop the project further. She is hoping to produce it next year. “One thing I know for sure is that Cinereach has given me some really amazing tools that I’ll be able to use on any future film endeavor,” she says.

Gabriel just announced that The Drawing will screen at Newfest in New York this June. He hopes it will continue to open doors for him and is currently working on making another short film and writing a feature script. He plans to follow the strategy of Tze Chun, an RFF advisor, who committed to making a short film every six months and writing a feature-length script every nine months in lieu of going to graduate school. Because of a successful short, Tze was able to finance his first low budget feature.

Nadia continues working as a DP and plans to devote her summer to festival submissions for Love Lockdown. She says, “my hope for Love Lockdown is that many people get to see it, that’s the real reward in filmmaking, sharing with others.” She adds that her next directing project may not be too far off. “If you want to be a director you have to direct films, in whatever capacity, so I see this as another stepping stone to achieving that goal.”

Question 6: Do you have any general advice for 2011 applicants and accepted fellows?

“The most important thing is to have a clear sense of the story you want to tell when you apply.  Even though the script may change, it is critical to know what is at the heart of your story and why this is important to you,” Gabriel offers. “For accepted fellows, there are so many opportunities and so much information available to you through RFF that it is probably impossible to take advantage of it all. The more prepared and organized you are, the more you will get out of it.”

Nadia recommends “be realistic about the type of film you want to make, and try to make it whether or not you get the grant. [If you are accepted] be prepared to do a lot of writing, production is only half the battle.” By writing, Nadia is referring to the content fellows are required to create during the fellowship to supplement the making of their films and assist Cinereach in showcasing the filmmakers (via Cinereach.org, the Reach Out screening event, and blog posts that chronicle what each fellow is learning from mentors and advisors).

Anthony encourages applicants to put as much effort as possible into the application process.  “Fight for it, he says. This opportunity is priceless.” He urges accepted fellows not to “force the process.” Be honest with yourself and Cinereach about your uncertainties and what is really driving you to produce your film.”

Courtney’s advice is “just keep making movies. Just keep writing, shooting and watching as many films as possible. As I learned from a Cinereach workshop, ‘You can’t be a filmmaker if you don’t make films,’ so keep at it!”

    Events

    Archives

    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
    • 2008
    • 2007