Posts Tagged ‘Kaz Phillips Safer’

Cinereach’s 2011 Reach Film Fellowship concluded in April. Now that the fellows have had a little time to reflect on their experience making their films during the program, and because we miss having them around, we’ve asked them each to share something that has stuck with them. The first to report back is Kaz Phillips Safer, whose Jolly Friends Forever More is currently being submitted to festivals.


A post by Kaz Phillips Safer

Kaz during an RFF workshop at Cinereach

Rolling with the Punches
a guest post by Kaz Phillips Safer

One of the defining moments for me in my relationship with my mentor Karin Chien, was a somewhat frantic meeting during the final weeks of pre-production for my Reach Film Fellowship short, Jolly Friends Forever More. I was in the middle of a fairly typical and yet typically terrifying pre-pro crisis. Jolly Friend’s lone location was a public park, and I had a location in Prospect Park in Brooklyn that I really wanted to use.

Having shot in Prospect Park before, I knew that permitting could be tricky, and that due to our low-budget, fee-waivered status we’d be pretty low-priority (read: if the only motivation the parks folks have to process your paperwork is that you handed it on time and properly filled it out, it may well not happen). You have to bug them and bug them, and show up in person and pester and plead until someone signs or stamps or does whatever it is you need them to do. I am not hating on the parks, this is just what my experience has been.

As a preventative measure, and to give us both peace of mind, my producer Christina King and I had reached out to the Parks Department literally months before with our shoot dates and desired location. We were told we should be fine, and that we didn’t need to actually submit the paper work until a few weeks before. A week and a half out, while making what seemed like a routine call to check on something in our permit form, we were unceremoniously informed that our location was absolutely not available for the dates we needed it, as there was a parade through the park that weekend. They weren’t sure why anyone had ever told us it would be fine to shoot that weekend, but it certainly wasn’t, and there was nothing they could do for us.

A week and a half out we had no location, and the very stomach-sinking situation I had been working for months to avoid was suddenly all up in my face.  However, it was made even worse by the fact that, literally the day before, Christina had gotten a call for a short paid producing gig, working on a commercial. Being a multi-tasking freelancer type myself, and knowing that as much as you love any project you’re working on for free, when a paid gig comes around sometimes something has to give, I gave her my blessing to go MIA for a few days. After all, everything for the shoot was pretty much in place.

So suddenly I found myself with no location AND no producer in those critical final days when we needed to re-scout, re-lock, re-shot list, etc. a brand new location. Suffice to say, we did, which is a testimony to Christy’s stellar, nay, near-supernatural producing skills, but in that moment, trying to keep myself together as I enjoyed a nerve-jangling coffee with Karin, I was feeling the weight of working on a low-budget project where the Parks people give you the run around, and your producer has no choice but to say yes when a conflicting paying gig comes up because you don’t have enough money to pay her.

Producer Karin Chien on set with mentee Kaz Phillips Safer

Producer Karin Chien on set with Kaz

And I said to Karin, you know, I know it’ll be fine, but oh man, do I long for the day when I’m working on a project that everyone involved can be 100% focused on, and I don’t have to worry about folks having too much other stuff on their plate.  And Karin just kind of looked at me and was like, Kaz, that’s never the casePeople always have too much on their plate, always have three other projects going on the side, nineteen other places they ought to be, regardless of the size of the project. And I immediately knew she was completely right.  I had been looking at Karin as someone who was blissfully free of this kind of pitfall, and in that moment she reminded me, you’re an indie filmmaker.  It’s always like this.  Success means the MIA producer comes back, not that they never leave in the first place.

And in a weird way, it kind of gave me a bit of a thrill.  To be reminded, yes, you, for whatever combination of reasons, have chosen a career—an entire lifestyle—that is actually sort of designed for disaster.  Built to spill, as it were. And that actually, if you consider the way industries and art forms work as having a sort of evolutionary existence—having the shapes, patterns and tendencies they have for a specific reason—then it’s reasonable to say that the volatile nature of indie film production is actually quite adaptive. It can actually make for better projects, not worse ones.

Jolly Friends set: Owl Creek Park, Brooklyn

Jolly Friends Forever More set in Owl's Head Park

Case in point, my location disaster did in fact require my team to shift into location hunting overdrive, but the park we ended up finding, Owl’s Head Park in Bayridge, Brooklyn, was a vastly superior location than the spot in Prospect Park that we’d initially settled on. The upheavals may not be fun in the moment, but ultimately, they make you think harder, look further, and consider more possibilities.

And I guess it’s a good thing, because as Karin reminded me, there’s no end of the tunnel where it suddenly gets easy. Thank goodness, right?  Where would be the fun in that?

Kaz Phillips Safer is a Brooklyn-based filmmaker & video designer. She studied writing at Princeton University while also taking select filmmaking courses at NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts.  She is the video artist in residence for internationally acclaimed NYC-based dance theater company Witness Relocation. Her video work has been presented in France, Denmark, Poland, Russia, Australia and across the United States. In 2009 she was accepted into the American Film Institute’s Directing Workshop for Women where she developed and directed original HD short, Megafauna. The film went on to win AFI’s Jean Picker Firstenberg Award for Excellence and was released by IndiePix in October 2010. Kaz is currently developing several feature scripts, one of which is the recipient of a 2010 Jerome Foundation Development Grant.

Karin Chien, Kaz’s RFF mentor, has produced eight feature-length films, including Circumstance (2011), The Exploding Girl (2009), and The Motel (2005), which have won over 75 festival awards, premiered at Sundance and Berlin, and have been distributed internationally.

On April 13, 2011, Cinereach celebrated its outgoing Reach Film Fellows at the fourth annual Reach Out event. We screened all four Fellowship films for cast, crew, family and some friends of Cinereach, and surprised the fellows with bonus grants of $1,000 to put towards festival campaigns.

We’re so proud of the stunning finished films, and of how the fellows navigated the intense seven-month program, taking their films from concept to completion. For an overview of the 2011 Reach Film Fellowship, check out the behind-the-scenes video here. Our first album of photos from the event is up on Facebook (more to come).

Pictured above are the 2011 Reach Film Fellows with their mentors (from left to right) Marshall Curry, Matt Bockelman, Nancy Schwartzman, Nick Paley, Francisco Bello, Jay Van Hoy, Kaz Phillips Safer, and Karin Chien.

Pictured above are the 2011 Reach Film Fellows with their mentors (from left to right) Marshall Curry, Matt Bockelman, Nancy Schwartzman, Nick Paley, Francisco Bello, Jay Van Hoy, Kaz Phillips Safer, and Karin Chien.

The four 2011 Reach Film Fellows and Films are:

YHRTA

Matt BockelmanYou Have the Right to an Attorney (nonfiction)

You Have the Right to an Attorney enters the daily grind of two young public defenders in the South Bronx as they strive to resolve hundreds of client cases in a system they consider fundamentally broken. » More

OH_sm

Nick Paley, Open House (fiction)

In Open House a  young man visits his grandparents and is the first in his family to realize the  pair of them should no longer be living on their own.» More

JFFM_sm

Kaz Phillips Safer, Jolly Friends Forever More (fiction)

Jolly Friends Forever More tells the story of a homeless man who is befriended by a mysterious little girl that seems to appear and disappear at will. »  More

xoxosms

Nancy Schwartzman, xoxosms (nonfiction)

xoxosms follows the courtship of a young  couple that falls in love via Skype, chat and Facebook and relocates to be  together. » More

The four fellows were selected through an open application process and, once accepted, given a grant, production resources, access to the Cinereach staff, and help from a community of highly invested colleagues. The  mentors met one-on-one with the fellows at critical points throughout the program. Advisors led workshops on topics such as crowd funding, social media, festival strategy, post-production workflow and pitching, and consulting producers were on call to help throughout.

We look forward to seeing what the future holds for these talented filmmakers and sharing it with all of you.

Congratulations to Nick, Kaz, Nancy and Matt!

Learning to Shut Up:  A verbose director prepares to work with child actors

A post by Kaz Phillips Safer

A post by Kaz Phillips Safer

So, I would say that my biggest flaw as a director, the thing that I’m constantly working on, is that I tend to over-explain things to actors.  I’m a pretty cerebral, nay, nerdy person.  And I love ideas and I love words, and these things all come in super handy when I’m writing a script, especially since I tend to traffic in concepts and source material that are fairly esoteric and intellectual.  So being able to pull something out of the abstract and put it in literary form is a useful tool.  But when I get on set, I am always tempted to present the motivation or context of a scene to my actor in the form of a sort of diatribe.  A long-winded, highly convoluted thesis as to why they’re going to have this reaction and not that reaction to whatever’s going on. Not good.  I know this. I know I need to work on it.

A great piece of advice I once got from a very wise woman was, if you have fifteen notes, give two and the other thirteen will fall into place.  Her point being, drowning someone in “fixes” is not going to transform their performance into the nuanced, subtle, compelling nexus you were dreaming of, but just make them over think it, try to do too much, second guess what were probably good instincts in the first place, and feel overwhelmed and tighten up.  I completely get this intellectually, but have always found it hard to put into practice.

So, I have to think there was something fighting it out in my subconscious when I wrote a script in which one of the two main characters is a six-year-old girl. Didn’t occur to me until after I’d found out that I got the Reach Film Fellowship and started really gunning into the pre-production process that not only did I have no experience working with kids, but that I’d better get over my over-talky syndrome FAST because there is no better way to get a kid to clam up than to yammer at them about stuff they don’t understand. I mean, this has a negative effect on grown up actors who are used to dealing with crazy neurotic directors!

So suddenly I find myself in this self-imposed learn-to-shut-up boot camp.  How to proceed?

Going into this project, I knew what I was looking for in my young female lead. There is very little dialogue in my film (aside from a few brief lines at the very end). There is also some choreography, when my characters break into a simple, synchronized dance. So I wanted the girl I cast to be able to “play” and be un-self-conscious in front of the camera.  I didn’t want a peachy keen toothpaste commercial kid, but she did need to be kind of magnetic, not cute, but like you couldn’t take your eyes off her. I need the audience to fall in love with her and be rooting for her. And honestly, I wasn’t sure exactly what that meant, in terms of what I was looking for in an audition, I just kind of knew I’d know it when I saw it.

The audition process was going to be critical, but how to draw out these girls’ potential without suffocating their every impulse with over-explaining?  I decided to take some cues from a source that was more dance-based than dialogue-based.  It made sense for what I needed to see, and was also going to be a good exercise in keeping my direction lean and simple.

I’m the resident video designer for an experimental dance theater company.  I create and implement the multi-media elements of their performances—projections, live feed video, etc. In the process of working with them I have observed a thing or two about non-conventional forms of directing, and getting performances out of people. The artistic director of the company has a pretty remarkable ability, which I admire on a daily basis, to keep his direction founded in lean, task-based, uncomplicated instructions.  No lengthy contemplations on motive or emotional landscape (*sigh*) just clean, simple, cut to the bone type stuff.  Rather than getting bogged down in motivations or more method acting type approaches, he physicalizes everything and the performances are simpler, the performers can get there via more direct routes rather than having to think their way to a pre-determined emotional conclusion. Love it.  Working on it.

I realized, my audition needed to be very task based. So in addition to the more traditional “read these sides with the friend I have wrangled into donating their time for three hours” audition element, we also did a more unconventional exercise.  Basically, I asked the girls to come in to the audition prepared to tell me a story—could be true or made up, happy or sad, etc.  I would have them tell me the story.  Then, I would have them tell it to me again, but this time I gave them a bag full of toys and asked them to act out the stories using the toys, like puppets.

This was a very interesting and fun exercise.  There’s something quite delightful about presenting six year olds with a bag of toys and telling them to dig in. Their little faces kind of light up.  And for the most part, it worked.  Girls that had been a bit nervous or rigid when they walked in suddenly opened up like little flowers, doing voices, asking if they can use the toy bag as a character too, etc. Other girls had more difficulty with it.

It was the girls who “didn’t get it” that posed the biggest challenge for me, because suddenly I found myself in the position of having to “explain.”  I had boiled it down to what I thought was a pretty simple, basic explanation but when they’re still staring at you blankly, you have to improvise and that’s where I started getting nervous, because, sure, this was just the audition.  And if some little miss is having such a hard time understanding that I just want her to play, she’s probably not right for the role anyway.  But what about on set?  Losing light?  Flirting with over time?  What about when this little face is looking up at me not understanding why I need another take of her running to the bench and I’m struggling with the words rattling in my own head saying, she’s sort of in love with him, but in this platonic way, and even though she wants the whole cookie for herself, she sees that he’s hungry and wants to share it with him, but… have you read any Cormac McCarthy? Disaster.  Panic.  How am I going to get the finely shaded and layered performance if my actor if I can’t explain what I want from them???

And that’s when I remembered a great story, maybe apocryphal, though I like to think not, about the making of Casablanca.  And there’s some shot where Bogart’s standing at the window, and like, the Nazis have arrived, and he turns, brow furrowed and surveys the dark city and it just encapsulates the tone and tension and tragedy of the entire film.  And apparently someone asked Michael Curtiz later what he had said to Bogart to prepare him for this moment, to capture so perfectly that moment in time, what motivation or explanation he had given that resulted in such a charged, poignant performance.  And Curtiz apparently said, “I told him to stand there, count to ten, then turn his head to the left.”

The girl I ended up casting, Arden Truax, is a non-actor, though her mom is an acting teacher who works with my husband.  She’s this amazing elfin creature who went about her audition and callback very seriously.  At first I wasn’t sure, because I wanted the Penny character to transmit a sense of joy.  But then I realized it was just like the Casablanca situation.  It’s not her job to make the joy, it’s her job to walk to the bench, sit down, take the cookie out of her bag and hand it to the guy.  I just have to construct the world around her so that the end result is incandescent.  All she needs to give me is a big eyed freckle nosed canvas to paint on.  And that, I can do without saying a word.

Kaz Phillips Safer is a 2011 Reach Film Fellow. HIn her film RFF supported film,  Jolly Friends Forever More, the boundary between imagination and hallucination are tested when a homeless man is befriended by a mysterious little girl that seems able to appear and disappear at will. Kaz’s previous film Megafauna was directed and developed at AFI’s Directing Workshop for Women. It won AFI’s 2010 Jean Picker Firstenberg Award for Excellence and is distributed by IndiePix. Kaz’s RFF mentor, Karin Chien, has produced seven feature-length films, including The Exploding Girl (2009), The Motel (2005) and Robot Stories (2002), which have won over 75 festival awards, premiered at Sundance and Berlin, and have been distributed internationally.

    Archives

    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
    • 2008
    • 2007